Post details: FireWire vs. USB 2.0
2007-06-28
FireWire vs. USB 2.0
ArsTechnica: "Report: FireWire doomed to niche interface status"
...
Part of USB 2.0's success in supplanting FireWire as the high-speed connectivity interface of choice has to do with cost.
Initially, FireWire's IP owners demanded royalties of $1.00 per port (later dropped to 25¢ per system) from manufacturers, which turned some OEMs off. In contrast, Intel strongly backed USB 2.0 and quickly integrated support into its chipsets, where FireWire was usually available in PC systems only in the form of a PCI card add-on. As a result, FireWire's advantages over USB 2.0—like being able to support multiple hosts per bus and peer-to-peer device communication—were rendered irrelevant, and the interface is being relegated to niche status in the PC and peripheral market.
Seems like demanding (relatively) large royalties does not help to get a large market share and sustain it. On a slightly different topic, same can be said about adding DRM to one's products and preventing users from using what they have legally bought.
Comments, Pingbacks:
You've no idea how true that is - one of the principal FireWire owners is actually Apple.
This post has 9 feedbacks awaiting moderation...
Leave a comment:
captsolo weblog
See also:
- My homepage (captsolo.net)
- @CaptSolo on Twitter
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Search
Gallery
www.flickr.com
|
Categories
Archives
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (5)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (5)
- September 2007 (4)
- August 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (3)
- More...
- more...

